Objectives

1. Improve communication between educational institutions, government agencies, and Vietnamese families with children in special education programs across Greater Boston and New England.

2. Enhance understanding of special education rights and services among Vietnamese families in the region.

3. Increase meaningful engagement of Vietnamese families in the IEP process and other school programs across New England.

4. Provide cultural mediation to bridge gaps between the school system, government agencies, and Vietnamese families.

5. Address systemic barriers and microaggressions faced by Vietnamese American families in the special education system across the region.

6. Promote culturally responsive practices in special education services throughout Greater Boston and New England.

7. Ensure compliance with legal requirements for language access and special education services across the region.

8. Foster collaboration between the Department of Developmental Services (DDS), Department of Children and Families (DCF), and educational institutions to provide comprehensive support for Vietnamese families.

 

Background and Need

Representation in Special Education

Although specific data on Vietnamese students in New England's special education programs is scarce, available research reveals significant challenges for this community. Studies show that up to 10% of children in the Vietnamese American community may require special educational services (Nguyen, 2020). Alarmingly, there is a disproportionately high representation of students from racial or ethnic minority groups and low-income households in special education programs in Boston (American University School of Education, 2023). This trend raises concerns that Vietnamese students may also face overrepresentation or misidentification in special education, a pattern that can result in inappropriate placements or limited access to suitable support. These challenges are compounded by linguistic and cultural barriers, making it even more difficult for families to navigate the complexities of the education system. The community's struggle is underscored by the active involvement of organizations like Vòng Tay Cha Mẹ Việt (The Circle of Vietnamese Parents of Boston), which strive to address these issues through advocacy and support for special education initiatives.

Cultural and Linguistic Challenges

Vietnamese families face unique cultural and linguistic barriers in navigating the U.S. special education system:

 1. Cultural Perceptions and Stigma: There is a prevalent assumption within the Vietnamese American community that disabilities might be perceived as a "debt" from sins committed in a previous life. This cultural stigma can significantly affect how families approach and engage with special education services (Nguyen, 2020).

 2. Language Barriers: Many Vietnamese families struggle with English proficiency, complicating communication with school staff and understanding of special education services (Nguyen, 2020).

 3. Inadequate Translation Services: Current translation services often fail to capture cultural nuances, leading to misunderstandings and fragmented communication during critical processes like IEP meetings (Ulloa, 2023).

 4. Limited Parental Involvement: Vietnamese parents often have restricted involvement in the Individualized Education Plan (IEP) process, often relegated to roles of legal compliance rather than active participation (Jung, 2011).

Systemic and Institutional Barriers

 1. Lack of Cultural Competence: Educators and service providers often lack understanding of Vietnamese cultural norms, values, and belief systems, leading to ineffective engagement strategies (Harry, 2008).

 2. Misidentification and Misplacement: Culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students, including Vietnamese students, are often misidentified and misplaced in special education programs due to biases and inadequate assessment practices (National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems, 2004).

 3. Limited Access to Rigorous Education: Students of color, particularly those with disabilities, are often placed in segregated settings that limit their access to a rich and rigorous education (Learning Disabilities Association of America, 2023).

 4. Resource Disparities: There is a significant disparity in resources and support available to students with disabilities across different districts in Massachusetts. Wealthier districts are more likely to provide out-of-district placements and settlements for special education, while less affluent districts struggle to meet these needs (Vaznis, 2023).

 5. Legal and Financial Barriers: Many families face legal and financial barriers when seeking appropriate educational placements for their children. The use of nondisclosure agreements in settlements prevents families from sharing information that could help others navigate the system (Nguyen, 2020).

Long-term Impacts of Inadequate Support

The failure to provide adequate support to Vietnamese families in special education can have severe long-term consequences:

 1. Academic and Educational Outcomes:

- Higher dropout rates among CLD students (National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems, 2004).

- Limited access to rigorous education, perpetuating educational inequities (Learning Disabilities Association of America, 2023).

 2. Social and Emotional Impacts:

- Stigmatization and self-esteem issues.

- Exacerbation of behavioral challenges due to culturally inappropriate interventions.

 3. Economic and Career Implications:

- Reduced employment opportunities due to educational setbacks.

- Increased reliance on social services and reduced contributions to the economy (Learning Disabilities Association of America, 2023).

 4. Family and Community Impact:

- Increased financial burden on families due to healthcare, rehabilitation, and special education costs (Nguyen, 2020)

- Social exclusion and stigma, leading to isolation and reduced social support networks

 

Conceptual Framework

The VietSpecEd Initiative is grounded in a multifaceted and interdisciplinary research-packed framework that integrates four key theories: Critical Disability Theory (CDT), Huber and Solorzano's Racial Microaggression Model, Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and Asian Critical Race Theory (AsianCrit). This integrated approach provides a robust foundation for addressing the complex challenges faced by Vietnamese families with children in special education programs within the Greater Boston and New England educational systems.

Critical Disability Theory (CDT)

Critical Disability Theory serves as a cornerstone of the VietSpecEd Initiative, providing a lens through which to examine disability not merely as a medical or functional deficit, but as a complex social, cultural, and political phenomenon (Devlin & Pothier, 2006). CDT challenges traditional views of disability and emphasizes the importance of understanding disability through the lived experiences of individuals (Sztobryn-Giercuszkiewicz, 2018). In the context of the VietSpecEd Initiative, CDT informs our approach to:

- Addressing ableism within educational systems by conceptualizing it as a grounded concept (Mulderink, 2023).

- Developing strategies to create more inclusive and equitable educational environments for Vietnamese students with disabilities across New England.

- Shifting from deficit-based models to more inclusive and socially aware frameworks in special education practices.

Huber and Solorzano's Racial Microaggression Model

The Racial Microaggression Model, grounded in Critical Race Theory (CRT), provides a framework for identifying, disrupting, and dismantling systemic racism in educational settings (Huber & Solorzano, 2015). While specific studies on its application in special education settings are limited, the model offers valuable insights for addressing racial inequities in these contexts. In the VietSpecEd Initiative, this model guides our approach to:

 - Recognizing and addressing subtle, often unconscious forms of racism that may occur in special education settings across Greater Boston and New England.

- Examining how racial microaggressions affect the educational experiences and outcomes of Vietnamese students in special education.

- Developing strategies for educators and government agencies to mitigate the impact of racial microaggressions. 

Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB)

The Theory of Planned Behavior provides a framework for understanding how individuals make behavioral choices based on their attitudes, perceived norms, and behavioral control (Ajzen, 1991). In the context of the VietSpecEd Initiative, TPB informs our strategies for:

- Understanding and enhancing parental involvement of Vietnamese families in special education programs across the region.

- Analyzing how Vietnamese students and their families make educational choices, such as participation in special education services or advocacy for their rights.

- Developing interventions that address the attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control of Vietnamese families regarding special education.

Asian Critical Race Theory (AsianCrit)

AsianCrit, a branch of Critical Race Theory, specifically addresses the unique racial experiences and challenges faced by Asian Americans (Chang, 1999). This framework is crucial for the VietSpecEd Initiative as it provides:

- A lens to understand how racism affects Asian Americans, including Vietnamese Americans, both personally and institutionally across New England.

- Insights into how educational policies can perpetuate racial stereotypes and inequalities, such as the model minority myth.

- Guidance for implementing culturally sustaining pedagogies that recognize and support the diversity within Asian American communities in the region.

Integration of Theoretical Frameworks

The integration of these four theoretical frameworks provides a comprehensive approach to addressing the multifaceted challenges faced by Vietnamese families in the special education system across Greater Boston and New England. This integrated approach allows the VietSpecEd Initiative to:

- Address both disability-related and racial/ethnic challenges simultaneously.

- Develop culturally responsive and sustaining practices that recognize the intersectionality of disability, race, and culture.

- Create interventions that consider the attitudes, norms, and perceived control of Vietnamese families while addressing systemic barriers and microaggressions.

- Advocate for policy changes that reflect a nuanced understanding of the Vietnamese American experience in special education across the region.

 

A Call to Action and Synergy: 

The VietSpecEd Initiative embodies a comprehensive and innovative effort to address the unique challenges faced by Vietnamese families with children in special education programs throughout Greater Boston and New England. This initiative integrates cultural mediation, effective communication strategies, and systemic change efforts to improve educational outcomes for Vietnamese American students with disabilities. By fostering stronger collaboration among families, educators, government agencies, and communities, we aim to build a more inclusive, equitable, and culturally responsive special education system that meets the needs of New England’s diverse populations.

We invite support and partnership from public schools, parents, government agencies, scholar-practitioners, and Vietnamese communities to help make this vision a reality. Together, we can drive meaningful and lasting change.

 

References:

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

American University School of Education. (2023). Disproportionality in special education. https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/disproportionality-special-education/

Boston Planning & Development Agency. (2017). Vietnamese in Boston. http://www.bostonplans.org/documents/research-other/vietnamese-a-prosperous-boston-for-all

Mulderink, C (2023). The intersection of racism and ableism in disability support services. ScholarWorks. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/cj_etds/156

Chang, R. S. (1999). Disoriented: Asian Americans, law, and the nation-state. New York University Press.

Devlin, R., & Pothier, D. (2006). Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. UBC Press.

Harry, B. (2008). Collaboration with culturally and linguistically diverse families: Ideal versus reality. Exceptional Children, 74(3), 372-388. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400306

Huber, L. P., & Solorzano, D. G. (2015). Racial microaggressions as a tool for critical race research. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18(3), 297-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2014.994173

Jung, A. W. (2011). Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) and barriers for parents from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Multicultural Education, 19(3), 21-25.

Learning Disabilities Association of America. (2023). Core principle: Disproportionality in identification for special education. https://ldaamerica.org/core-principle-disproportionality-in-identification-for-special-education/

Massachusetts Department of Children and Families. (2023). Education. https://www.mass.gov/service-details/education

Massachusetts Department of Developmental Services. (2023). Family support. https://www.mass.gov/family-support

National Center for Culturally Responsive Educational Systems (2004). Disproportionate representation of culturally and linguistically diverse students in special education. https://www.colorincolorado.org/article/disproportionate-representation-culturally-and-linguistically-diverse-students-special

Nguyen, T. (2020). Tật Nguyền: Exploring experiences of Vietnamese American parents in raising children with disabilities in the United States (Order No. 27994877). https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/tật-nguyền-exploring-experiences-vietnamese/docview/2455935559/se-2

Sztobryn-Giercuszkiewicz, J. (2018). Critical Disability Theory as a theoretical framework for disability studies. In E. Zakrzewska-Manterys & J. Niedbalski (Eds.), Sociological reflections on disability (pp. 29-44).

Ulloa, J. (2023, January 5). New law moves toward better translation of special ed documents, but families in California want more. LAist. https://laist.com/news/education/new-law-moves-toward-better-translation-of-special-ed-documents-but-families-in-california-want-more

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2023). Boston Area Employment – October 2023. https://www.bls.gov/regions/new-england/news-release/areaemployment_boston.htm

Watanabe, P., & Lo, S. (2019). Asian Americans in Greater Boston: Building communities old and new. In P. Ciurczak, S. Kendall, & E. Stone (Eds.), Changing faces of Greater Boston: A report from Boston Indicators, The Boston Foundation, UMass Boston, and the UMass Donahue Institute. https://www.bostonindicators.org/reports/report-website-pages/changing-faces-of-greater-boston/changing-faces-of-greater-boston-report

World Population Review. (2024). Boston, Massachusetts population 2024. https://worldpopulationreview.com/us-cities/boston-ma-population